Bmw Five Forces

Topics: BMW, Automotive industry, General Motors Pages: 14 (5073 words) Published: June 19, 2009
Table of contents

BMW: case study analysis

Q1: Business environment and main trends in 2004
The global car market started decline in 2003, led by market falls in North America and Western Europe. Other regions of the world led by East Asia are seeing further car market expansion in 2003. In 2004, projections for livelier economic growth underpin the resumption of car market growth in Western Europe and North America. (Langley 2004, p691-711) Although the more stringent laws can eat away at companies' earnings, they also provide the stimulus to develop new technologies and markets. Another major external factor affecting the current situation of BMW is that industry structure is becoming more and more concentrated. In this era of auto-industry consolidation, BMW is seen as a medium-sized business which could face problems in the future if it doesn't take into consideration strategic alliances. One of the external economic factors is that in the last years a large degree of overcapacity has been experienced in the car industry running at 20% to 30% in Europe. This overcapacity has been caused by a drop in demand and sales, probably because of a global economic instability which has led consumers to reduce spending on non essential goods. (Johnson 2008) The decline is brought about by lower car demand in North America and Western Europe, both relatively mature car markets that have been adversely impacted this year by high energy prices and fragile consumer sentiment. (Lynch 2005) The automobile industry is becoming more and more competitive, with 6 major groups which have been formed in the last 3 years. Strategy is a perceived pattern in actions past or yet to come. It is a label applied to patterns in action; strategy evaluation requires a consideration of both current and likely future results against the resources committed to the strategy. This is only an overview of the major concerns and findings from Johnson G. Scholes K. and Whittington R. (2005). Key environmental influences like any modern industry, car manufacturing today is strongly affected by external social and environmental pressures, which influence both current production practices and the development of future products and technologies. Environmental standards are mostly set by government regulation and even associations within the automobile industry. These acts aim to as anti-emission laws get stricter every year, and companies look to double or triple their fuel efficiency, alternative technologies are being developed to replace the traditional gasoline engines, and have started to hit the market. Increased fuel-economy and decreasing vehicle weight are gradual changes that slowly improve automobile performance; disruptive technologies include new fuel sources such as electricity, solar energy, and fuel cells. (Jarzabkowski 2004, p539-60) Below is the graph showing the production of car's in UK 2003-04.

Global production per car manufacture

Source: International Organisation of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers

A stage has been reached in which a change in thinking is required. In addition, global economic activity has been influenced by falls in equity prices and geopolitical tensions, including the related threat to oil prices, all having a negative impact on the economy. These factors have also influenced development in the majority of the world automobile markets. Increases in safety standards for automobiles, also mean that nowadays cars take longer time to be developed and manufacturers should now focus on pre-marketing activities, making cars look more desirable to consumers due to their safety. (Stacey 2007) Competitive Forces Competitive forces determine the relative market power of competitors, the kind of competition they engage in, the factors that give some of them a competitive advantage, and the relative attractiveness of that market compared to others. BMW's rival Daimler-Chrysler continued competing in the traditional...

References: 1.Ahlstrom, J. and E. Sjostrom. (2005). CSOs and Business Partnerships: Strategies for interaction , Business Strategy and the Environment 14(4), 230-240.
2.Balogun, J., and G. Johnson. (2005) 'From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: The impact of change recipient sensemaking '. Organisation Studies 26/11: 1573-1601.
3.Blank, H
4.Chow I, Holbert N, Kelley L and Yu J, (2004), "Business Strategy - An Asia Pacific Focus", 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall
5.Clark, E
6.Coe, N.; Hess, M.;Yeung, H.W.-c.; Dicken, P.; and Henderson, J. (2004). Globalizing regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29:468-84.
7.Czarniawska, B. and T. Hernes. (2005) Constructing Macro Actors According to ANT , in B. Czarniawska and T. Hernes (eds.), Actor-Network Theory and Organizing (Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen), pp. 7-13.
8.Dawson, S. (2004) Balancing Self-Interest and Altruism: corporate governance alone is not enough, Corporate Governance - An International Review, 12, 130-133.
9.Dejean, F., J.-P. Gond and B. Leca. (2004). Measuring the Unmeasured: An Institutional Entrepreneurship Strategy in an Emergent Industry, Human Relations 57(6), 741-764.
10.Dentchev, N. A. and A. Heene. (2004) 'Managing Reputation of Re-structuring Corporations: Send the Right Signal to the Right Stakeholder ', Journal of Public Affairs 4(1), 56-72.
11.Floricel, S., and A. Langley (2004) 'Strategy as dynamic leverage '. Conference of the European Group of Organisation Science, Ljubljana, May.
12.Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., and Sturgeon, T
13.Gertler, M. S. (2004). Manufacturing culture: The institutional geography of industrial practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.Gharib, M. and E. Wahlqvist (2004) A standardisation Story and its Paradox: Creating Credibility for the Business Social Compliance Initiative.
15.Goetschalckx, Mark, Bernhard Fleischmann. (2005). Strategic network planning. H. Stadtler, C. Kilger, eds. Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning, 3rd ed. Springer, BerlinHeidelberg, Germany, 117-137.
16.Gunasekaran, A. and Kobu, B. (2007) Modelling and analysis of business process reengineering. Int. J. Production Res, 40(11), 2521-2546.
17.Hambrick, D. C. (2004) 'The disintegration of strategic management: It 's time to consolidate our gains '. Strategic Organisation 2/1: 91-98.
18.Hart, S
22.Johnson G. Scholes K. and Whittington R. (2005) Strategic analysis of BMW 'Exploring Corporate Strategy '.
23.Jones, M. T. (2005). The Transnational Corporation, Corporate Social Responsibility and the ' 'Outsourcing ' ' Debate, Journal of American Academy of Business 6(2), 91-97.
24.Kumon, H. (2004). Analytical perspectives on Japanese factories in Europe. In The hybrid factory in Europe: The Japanese management and production system transferred, ed. H. Kumon and T. Abo, 1-31. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
25.Langley, A. (2004) 'Strategies for theorizing from process data '. Academy of Management Review 24/4: 691-711.
26.Letza, S., Sun, X
27.Lynch R, (2005), "Corporate Strategy", 4th Edition, FT Prentice Hall
28.McDonald, S
29.McLaren, D. (2004) Global Stakeholders: corporate accountability and investor engagement, Corporate Governance - An International Review, 12, 191-201.
30.Meyr, Herbert, Jens Rhode, Michael Wagner, Ulrich Wetterauer. (2005). Architecture of selected APS. H. Stadtler, C. Kilger, eds. Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning, 3rd ed. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany, 341-353.
31.O 'Brien, S. (2006) Try Slowing Down to Survive. Herald Sun Newspaper, Feb 24 2006, p. 20.
32.Potts, S. D. and Matuszewski, I. L. (2004) Ethics and Corporate Governance, Corporate Governance - An International Review, 12, 177-179.
33.Stacey R D, (2007), "Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics", 5th Edition, Prentice Hall.
34.Suddaby, R
35.Tegarden, Linda F., Y. Sarason and C. Banbury. (2003). "Linking Strategy Processes to Performance Outcomes in Dynamic Environments: The Need to Target Multiple Bull 's Eyes. ' ' Journal of Managerial Issues 15(2): 133-153.
36.Vaara, E., B. Kleymann, and H. Seristo. (2004) 'Strategies as discursive constructions: The case of airline alliances '. Journal of Management Studies 41/1: 1-36.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • The Five Forces Essay
  • Porter’s Five Forces Essay
  • Porter five forces Essay
  • Essay about Portes Five forces
  • People's Bank and Porter's Five Forces Essay
  • Porters 5 Forces Essay
  • Provide an Analysis of an Organisation Explaining the Relative Importance of Each of Porter’s Five Forces for the Organisation’s Strategic...
  • Five Forces Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free